Check a before-and-after claim
Prompt that tests a before-and-after claim against season, chance and other explanations and gives a clear verdict. Paste it into an AI tool of your choice, which then checks claims.
- Topic
- Deciding & analysing
- Type
- Prompt
- Level
- Intermediate
- Time
- about 8 min
Results depend on the tool, the model and what you enter.
Result preview
Example: written by our editors, not real AI output.
Testable statement: orders per week rose from 410 to 470 (+15%) after the new form, four weeks before versus four weeks after. Season: open, peak season started in week 2 after Chance: open, weeks varied by ±40 before as well Promotion at the same time: supports another explanation Measurement: ruled out, counting unchanged Verdict: plausible, not supported Test: show the form to only half of the visits for two weeks Missing: figures for the same period last year
Fill in
What you type stays in this browser window. We store and send nothing.
- Since the new order form we get more orders
- The price increase did not cost us customers
- The Tuesday newsletter works better than Friday's
- Since adding website chat we get fewer calls
- The new training lowered the error rate
- start of the peak season
- a promotion at the same time
- new tracking installed
- a large customer left
- nothing, as far as we know
Your prompt
You have edited the prompt. Changes in the fields above no longer overwrite it.
This is an instruction for an AI, not the result itself.
Where this prompt works
These AI tools are a good fit for this prompt:
How to use it
- Fill in the fields or tap a suggestion. Leave out names, addresses and other personal data.
- Copy the finished prompt into an AI tool of your choice.
- Ask someone who did not introduce the change to read the check and suggest other explanations that are missing.
Why does this work?
Before-and-after comparisons look convincing but easily confuse chance, season and cause. The fixed list of other explanations slows down the wish that your own measure worked.
Tips
- A verdict of "open" is not a failure. It shows which small test will settle the question next time.