AI Compare AI Compare

Check prices, features and limits.

Pricing market
Automatic
Language
EN

Bito

Review code with repository context in Git, IDE and CLI; AI Architect adds a knowledge graph for planning and coding agents.

Free accessFree plan
Paid fromTeamUp to 25 seats; 5000 reviewed lines/seat/month in a shared workspace pool

Category: Development & Code · Code quality & documentation

Features

Price depends on indexed codebase and agent/analysis usage; no public unit rate. Up to 25 seats; 5000 reviewed lines/seat/month in a shared workspace pool. Overage USD 5 per 1000 lines; an adjustable spend limit stops further reviews.

Prices and plans

TierPricePeriodWhat you get
FreefreefreeFree AI pull-request summaries, not full reviews
GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket; 30+ programming and 20+ output languages
Fair use applies; no fixed public free review allowance
Team12 / 15 USDper seat/month: annual / monthly billingUp to 25 seats; 5000 reviewed lines/seat/month in a shared workspace pool
Overage USD 5 per 1000 lines; an adjustable spend limit stops further reviews
Codebase-aware reviews in Git, IDE and CLI; suggested fixes and analytics
50 AI chat requests per user/day; cloud hosted
Professional20 / 25 USDper seat/month: annual / monthly billingNo fixed seat cap; still 5000 lines/seat/month and USD 5 per 1000 extra lines
Custom review rules, Jira, Confluence, Google Docs and CI/CD reviews
14-day trial without a card: default 15 reviews per user, 20 AI chats per day; large-PR restrictions
Optional self-hosting adds USD 5/seat/month
Code Reviews Enterprisecontact salescustomCustom usage limits and cross-repository impact with AI Architect
Cloud, self-hosting or on-premises; multiple organizations, SSO/SAML and contracted support
AI Architect Professionalcontact salesusage-basedCodebase knowledge graph, technical design, impact analysis and grounded code generation
Jira, Linear, Slack and MCP; Bito cloud with usage analytics
Price depends on indexed codebase and agent/analysis usage; no public unit rate
AI Architect Enterprisecontact salesusage-basedAI Architect Professional plus Jira, Confluence, Google Docs and observability data indexing
Custom analysis triggers and templates; self-hosting or on-premises, SSO/SAML and agreed SLA

Limits

Billing documentation says new workspaces default to automatic seat assignment and purchase; manual assignment or automatic assignment without purchase are selectable. This differs from the simplified pricing FAQ. Plan pooled seats and lines to avoid unexpected purchases. The privacy policy says AI requests are not retained or used for model training; confidential code/project data in cloud deployments may instead be stored until the business relationship ends, and relationship/usage metadata indefinitely.

Similar tools

FAQ

Is Bito available for free?

Yes. A permanently free plan is published, not a time-limited trial.

Where is Bito's vendor based?

Bito Inc., based in USA. For data processing and privacy terms the vendor's own contract governs.

How is Bito billed?

Team and Professional include 5000 reviewed lines per seat/month in a shared workspace pool, then USD 5 per 1000 lines. PR diffs and relevant context are counted, not just new lines. Team is limited to 25 seats. Professional self-hosting adds USD 5/seat/month. AI Architect is quoted separately based on indexed codebase and usage.

Is Bito still active?

Active AI Code Reviews and AI Architect offerings with separate pricing models.

How many plans are documented for Bito?

The catalog documents 6 plans with price, billing period, and included features.

Which use case is Bito categorized for?

Bito is listed in the catalog under “Development & Code.”

Where do the details about Bito come from?

Prices, limits, and product details are documented against the listed official vendor page.

How we compare

We compare free access, paid entry, plan limits, features and the listed official sources. Unsourced figures stay marked as not published.

Only confirmed entries appear in the catalog. Prices, plans and limits come from listed official vendor pages. Missing figures stay marked as not published. Result lists are alphabetical by default and can be switched to Free access first; neither is a quality ranking. The vendor page always wins.

Edited and checked by the AI Compare team

Sources

Visit site (opens in a new tab)

Spotted an outdated figure? Vendor pages change without notice. Report an error