Check UI copy and alt text for gaps and misleading wording Prompts
Reviews interface copy and image descriptions against the actual surface and flags gaps or contradictions, without certifying accessibility.
- Area
- Development & IT
- Level
- Advanced
- Good for
- Review the copy and alt text of a screen before a release
- Scan a landing page for empty or misleading image descriptions
- Collect open points for editorial or engineering work
How it works
- Paste the visible copy, the existing alt text and a short description of each surface or image.
- Say which surfaces are interactive, such as buttons, links, icons or purely decorative images.
- Do not adopt a verdict against a standard and do not invent image content you have not described.
To copy
Check my UI copy and alt text for gaps and misleading wording. Do not certify accessibility, compliance with a standard or legal conformity. Do not invent image content that is not in my description. Context: [screen, page, component] Visible copy (labels, buttons, hints, error messages): [paste copy] Existing alt text or aria descriptions: [paste text] What is actually visible or actionable on the surface: [paste description] Which elements are interactive, informative or purely decorative: [paste list] Check: 1. Gaps: which interactive or informative elements have no alt text, no accessible name or empty copy? 2. Contradiction: where does the text say something different from the described surface or image? 3. Decoration: which purely decorative images still have alt text that gets in the way? 4. Redundancy: which alt texts only repeat a visible neighbouring label? 5. Language: which wordings are unclear without the visual context? Output: - table: element | current copy or alt text | issue | suggestion, only from my description - list of elements where my details are missing - short prioritisation by understandable use, not by a standard Rules: no invented image details. No badge, no score, no legal statement. Suggestions are drafts for a human to review.