AI Compare AI Compare

Check prices, features and limits.

Pricing market
Automatic
Language
EN

ASReview LAB

Open-source software for active-learning-assisted screening in systematic literature reviews.

Free accessFree plan
Paid fromnot published

Category: Productivity · Science & research

Features

Prices and plans

TierPricePeriodWhat you get
ASReview LABfreefree, self-hostedActive learning from the user's relevance decisions
CSV, RIS and XLSX import and export
Customisable AI models and simulation using labelled datasets
macOS, Linux, Windows, server and Docker deployment

Limits

The AI prioritises records using human relevance decisions; researchers remain responsible for the final selection. A local installation keeps project data on the device; a server installation uses the selected server environment. Additional models, extensions and hosting must be configured for the user's data-protection needs.

Similar tools

FAQ

Is ASReview LAB available for free?

Yes. A permanently free plan is published, not a time-limited trial.

Where is ASReview LAB's vendor based?

ASReview LAB, Universität Utrecht, based in Netherlands. For data processing and privacy terms the vendor's own contract governs.

How is ASReview LAB billed?

No licence fees under Apache 2.0. Local installation, Docker or a self-hosted server; the operator provides infrastructure and administration.

How many plans are documented for ASReview LAB?

The catalog documents 1 plans with price, billing period, and included features.

Which use case is ASReview LAB categorized for?

ASReview LAB is listed in the catalog under “Productivity.”

Where do the details about ASReview LAB come from?

Prices, limits, and product details are documented against the listed official vendor page.

How we compare

We compare free access, paid entry, plan limits, features and the listed official sources. Unsourced figures stay marked as not published.

Only confirmed entries appear in the catalog. Prices, plans and limits come from listed official vendor pages. Missing figures stay marked as not published. Result lists are alphabetical by default and can be switched to Free access first; neither is a quality ranking. The vendor page always wins.

Edited and checked by the AI Compare team

Sources

Visit site (opens in a new tab)

Spotted an outdated figure? Vendor pages change without notice. Report an error